Surgical removal of all macroscopic tumour is the primary aim in the
treatment of endometrial cancer. This can be achieved by an abdominal
total hysterectomy. A bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH/BSO; removal of
both ovaries and fallopian tubes) is performed because the ovaries and
fallopian tubes are a preferred site for tumour spread. A pelvic
lymphadenectomy can be omitted in patients with well differentiated
tumours invading less than half of the myometrium as well as in patients
with moderately differentiated tumours not invading the myometrium. The
risk of lymph node involvement is less than 1 per cent in these patients.
All other patients should undergo a bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. The
risk of developing lymphoedema due to lymphadenectomy depends on the
extent of the lymphadenectomy and ranges from 10 to 20 per cent.
Endometrial cancer is generally considered radiosensitive. Therefore
radiotherapy has a role as adjunct therapy, as a treatment option for
recurrent disease and for palliation. To prevent local recurrence,
radiotherapy is usually applied in the form of vaginal cylinders (vaginal
vault brachytherapy) with or without external beam radiation to the
pelvis. Morbidity due to vaginal vault brachytherapy is usually very low
and includes vaginal stenosis and dyspareunia due to shrinkage of the
vagina. Radiotherapy given to the pelvis is associated with an increase
risk of side effects to the bladder and rectum (sterile cystitis,
proctisis) and sometimes to the intestine (diarrhoea, cramps). Severe side
effects are very rare and can be treated with diet or with bowel
resection.
Endometrial cancer cells frequently express hormone receptors and are
thus considered hormone receptor-positive. A clinical response to
progestins can be expected only if hormone receptors are expressed on the
cancer cells. The risk of thromboembolic complications due to progestin
therapy is slightly increased. At present, there is no role for adjuvant
therapy with progestins when a patient is considered tumour free after
surgery. Progestins are mainly used in the palliative setting, in which a
cure cannot be achieved. However, in 20 per cent of these patients a
temporary response to treatment, and consequently a better quality of
life, can be achieved.
No form of chemotherapy has been shown to be effective in the adjuvant
(post-operative) setting. Chemotherapy (Adriamycin, cisPlatin, Paclitaxel)
may be considered for palliation or in patients with uterine serous-papilary
carcinoma (UPSC).
Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is a pre-malignant condition only if
cytologic atypia is present (complex hyperplasia with cytologic atypia).
EH with cytologic atypia usually does not respond to progestins and
therefore a standard hysterectomy should be performed. EH without
cytologic atypia usually responds to progestins and does not progress to
invasive cancer.
Since the surgical removal of all macroscopic tumour is of major
prognostic importance, an extrafascial total hysterectomy and a bilateral
salpingo-oophorectomy is considered the standard treatment for early stage
endometrial cancer. Peritoneal washings should be taken for staging
reasons. Usually, the uterus is sent for frozen section examination. The
decision to perform a bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy is based on this
result. In patients with well differentiated tumours invading none or less
than half of the myometrium, a pelvic lymphadenectomy can be omitted. The
risk of lymph node involvement is less than 1 per cent in these patients.
All other patients should undergo a bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy if
there is invasion of the myoemtrium.
Since the surgical removal of all macroscopic tumour is of major
prognostic importance, a modified radical hysterectomy (which takes the
uterus and tissue from beside the cervix) and a bilateral
salpingo-oophorectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and
post-operative radiotherapy (vaginal vault brachytherapy ± external beam
radiotherapy) is recommended by most authors.
For medical reasons, some patients are considered not fit for advanced
surgery because the surgical and anaesthetic risks are too great. Primary
radiotherapy can be offered to these patients and achieves acceptable
local control with minimal risks. However, this treatment is not the
standard for Stage II endometrial cancer because:
Surgical removal of all macroscopic tumour is of major prognostic
importance. Post-operative radiation therapy will be recommended by most
authors. If biopsy at laparotomy reveals endometrial cancer and a surgical
removal of all macroscopic tumour seems impossible, primary radiotherapy
(external beam and brachytherapy) and/or therapy with progestins may be
considered.
Therapy should mainly consider local control (e.g. bleeding) in the
pelvis. Only limited data address the value of systemic treatment.
Chemotherapy has a role in the palliative setting in order to treat
cancer-related symptoms, but a cure for the cancer cannot be achieved.
Local control (bleeding) might be achieved by surgery and/or radiation
therapy and/or progestins.
Three quarters of all recurrences are detected in the first three years
after diagnosis. One third of these patients are free of symptoms when
their recurrence is diagnosed. Most recurrences occur in the vagina and
may be suitable for surgery with post-operative radiotherapy. If the
recurrence is only one metastasis in the vagina, a cure from the cancer
may be achieved. Patients with distant metastases might benefit from
hormonal treatment (progestin) rather than from chemotherapy, as only one
third of all patients show a response to chemotherapy.
With rare exceptions, endometrial cancer is not hereditary. The only
genetic syndrome associated with endometrial cancer is the Lynch II
syndrome and involves a strong family history of adenocarcinoma in the
colon, the ovaries, the female breast and the uterus. A geneticist should
evaluate a careful family pedigree including the last three generations.
In patients with proven Lynch II syndrome periodic mammography screening,
colonoscopies and endometrial samples should be performed.
In the past it has been argued that hormone replacement therapy might
increase the risk of recurrence, as endometrial cancer cells often
demonstrate hormone receptors. In contrast, retrospective analysis
demonstrated that endometrial cancer patients who had HRT had a higher
quality of life, had fewer recurrences and lived significantly longer than
those who did not. Unfortunately, no good quality prospective data are
available to confirm this. Patients with Stage I disease have such a good
prognosis that the risk of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease might
exceed the risk of recurrence. Therefore, HRT is recommended by several
authors for endometrial cancer patients.
Dr Andreas Obermair, MD
Associate
Professor of Gynecology and Obstetrics,
University
of Vienna
Clinical Fellow,
Gynaecologic Oncology,Queensland Centre for
Gynaecological Cancer.