The optimal treatment is by surgical excision. Laser is not encouraged
because its primary use is to preserve the basement membrane, to
facilitate wound healing. However, the dysplastic cells arise from the
basement membrane. This would suggest that laser can never adequately
treat VIN where the basement membrane is preserved. Clinical evidence
suggests otherwise. It is speculated that the successful treatment of the
VIN by laser may involve the action of growth factors and cytokines
released in the vicinity. The use of laser may be appropriate in trying to
preserve the clitoris or other vital vulval anatomy. 5-FU cream has been
used where there is extensive disease or where surgical removal is
difficult or undesirable. Where there is extensive VIN, consideration
should be given to a "skinning" or superficial (non-radical)
vulvectomy with placement of a skin graft. On occasions, the use of
plastic surgery flaps and other techniques may be necessary to cover the
defect left by surgical excision of VIN.
Patient requires a radical local excision or radical hemivulvectomy. If
the cancer is bilateral and multifocal, a radical vulvectomy is required.
If the cancer is associated with extensive VIN or extensive vulval
dystrophy, consideration given to radical vulvectomy. The surgical
objective is to obtain at least a 1 cm clinical margin around the primary
lesion, and ideally a 1.5 cm margin (2). The resection
should involve the full thickness of the vulva down to the deep fascia of
the urogenital diaphragm or the musculature of the leg, underlying the
circumscribed cutaneous resection.
nodes clinically negative: No inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy required.
Inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy is required. In the case of Stage
IB disease, the inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy can be deferred until
after histological quantitation of the depth of invasion confirms >1mm
invasion.
Inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy entails resection
of all the fibro-fatty-lymphatic tissue between the superficial and deep
fascia overlying the femoral triangle extending 2 cm cephalad to the
inguinal ligament, plus removal of all the femoral nodes adjacent to the
femoral vein and within the fossa ovalis. Resection of saphenous vein in
continuity with this tissue is optional.
Inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy is bilateral in
all cases except well lateralized T1 and T2 lesions on the labium majus (3).
If primary lesion is within 2 cm of the posterior fourchette or
clitoris/urethra then bilateral groin node resection is required. Separate
incisions for resection of primary disease and lymphadenectomy are
recommended but not mandatory. This has been proven to decrease wound
breakdown and perioperative morbidity with no compromise in survival (4).
These patients require pre-operative CT scan of the groins, pelvis and
abdomen. The primary disease is managed according to the principles
outlined above. The macroscopically enlarged or suspicious lymph nodes are
resected and submitted for frozen section to confirm histological status.
If no evidence of disease on frozen section, standard inguino-femoral
lymphadenectomy is completed. Otherwise all macroscopically enlarged nodes
are removed in the expectation that post-operative radiotherapy will be
administered. By preserving some clinically uninvolved
fibro-fatty-lymphatic tissue, there is a lower incidence of lymphoedema at
the completion of treatment.
If there is imaging evidence of pelvic lymphadenopathy, an
extra-peritoneal pelvic lymph node debulking is performed at the time of
groin node surgery. The superior skin flap is retracted cephalad and an
incision made through the rectus fascia 2 cm above and parallel to the
inguinal ligament. The underlying muscles are divided and separated
allowing access to the retroperitoneum. Bulky lymph nodes are then
systematically resected.
If there is a realistic expectation of resection of all macroscopic
disease with surgery, then this is the preferred treatment. Such surgery
can be difficult and option of vascular bypass grafting or myocutaneous
transposition flaps may need to be considered. Following surgery the
affected groin requires treatment consolidation with radiotherapy. If
primary surgery is not feasible, treat with primary radiotherapy. At
completion of radiotherapy, options include surgery or expectant
follow-up.
Lesions extending to the distal urethra may be resected with a 1+ cm
margin by resecting the distal urethra. Up to 1.5 cm (or the distal 1/3)
of distal urethra can be resected with minimal effect on urinary
continence. The greater the resection beyond this extent, the greater the
incidence of incontinence. If there is disease involving the distal anus,
rarely can an adequate margin around the primary tumour be obtained
without compromising rectal continence. These patients all require
bilateral inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy.
There is a place for exenterative surgery in selected cases. The
adjacent viscera may be sacrificed and the primary cancer resected en bloc
with bladder or rectum.
Where viscera-preserving radical vulvectomy surgery does not provide an
adequate margin around the primary disease, consideration is given to
preoperative (chemo-) radiotherapy. Groin node dissection can be completed
prior to this therapy and is not associated with significant delays in
treatment. This treatment technique is associated with very good survival
rates and avoids the need for a stoma. At the completion of radiotherapy,
consideration should be given to resection of the tumour bed to exclude
the presence of persisting disease.
Management of patients with this extent of disease is highly
individualized taking into account the patient's age and medical
condition, the extent and distribution of disease, the likelihood of cure.
Options for treatment include:-
- Exenterative surgery with radical vulvectomy and groin node
dissection
- Preoperative (chemo-)radiotherapy followed by surgery
- Surgery followed by (chemo-)radiotherapy
Treatment is individualized, but options include:-
- Observation (if margin negative)
- Reoperation
- (Chemo-) radiation of the primary surgical site.
Patients with N0 disease who refuse or are unfit for groin dissection
can be treated with inguino-femoral (chemo-)radiotherapy. With modern
anaesthetics and peri-operative care there are very few patients who are
truly unfit for surgery. There is a randomized trial comparing primary
radiation and primary surgery in the management of groin nodes. This
demonstrated a superior outcome for patients managed surgically (7).
With the utilization of pre-treatment CT scan of the groin to determine
nodal depth and to plan treatment, it is possible that the results for
radiotherapy would be better.
Where there is a single lymph node involved with microscopic metastatic
disease, no adjuvant treatment is required.
Where there are 2 or more microscopically positive lymph nodes or 1 or
more macroscopically positive lymph nodes, or a single node with
significant extra-capsular spread, for bilateral groin plus whole pelvic
radiotherapy (5).
15-40% of patients develop recurrent disease. 70% of these patients
will have local disease with 55-90% of these being an isolated local
recurrence. Aggressive management of patients with an isolated local
recurrence is associated with prolonged survival and quality of life.
In patients with other patterns of recurrence, treatment is
individualized incorporating
Vulval melanoma is the 2nd commonest vulval malignancy. The most
important aspect of treatment is adequate radical resection of the primary
lesion. There are limited data regarding the extent of resection margin,
however a 1-2cm margin is widely quoted as adequate.
The role of inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy is contentious. Some argue
that if nodes are negative then resection is unnecessary and if positive,
the prognosis is so poor and adjuvant treatments so ineffective that the
surgical intervention cannot be justified.
The contrary view is that the nodal status provides important
prognostic information and is associated with minimal morbidity.
Furthermore, this will often provide local disease control even if there
is a high risk of distant failure. Finally, these patients can be offered
investigational protocols such as vaccine therapy.
- The conventional treatment of this lesion is radical local excision
+/- bilateral inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy (depending on depth of
invasion). This is associated with significant psychosexual morbidity.
These patients may be offered an investigational protocol consisting
of chemo-radiation to the primary lesion with preservation of the
clitoris (6). The groin nodes are managed using a
conventional surgical approach. There are several patients treated in
the unit who have been successfully managed in this manner and are
being followed long term.
The total dose and the dose per fraction, depends on the volume
irradiated and whether concomitant chemotherapy is used. In general, the
lower of the total dose options is used if concomitant chemotherapy is
used. The dose per fraction recommended is between 1.6-1.8 Gy with the
lower dose per fraction preferred when using concomitant chemotherapy.
45-50 Gy in 1.6-1.8 Gy per fraction.
45-50 Gy in 1.6-1.8 Gy per fraction to large volume then boost
macroscopic disease to 54-60 Gy in 1.6-1.8 Gy per fraction.
45-50 Gy in 1.6-1.8 Gy per fraction followed by surgery 4-6 weeks
later.
45-50 Gy in 1.6-1.8 Gy per fraction to large volume them boost
macroscopic disease to 54-60 Gy in 1.6-1.8 Gy per fraction.
Options include:-
- Cisplatin 40mg/m2 per week
- Cisplatin 80mg/m2 D1 or 40 mg/m2 D1 and D2 plus 5FU 800mg/m2/day IV
infusion for 4 days (96 hrs) in first and fifth week of radiation.
Femoral neck tolerance 42-47 Gy
The patient is treated supine with hips abducted to reduce groin folds,
eg feet in stocks.
CT planning is essential to define the depth of the inguino-femoral
nodes.
Primary (vulva) portals should be by radiotherapy portals that
encompass the primary tumour with a 20mm margin. If unifocal disease in
the vulva, a direct perineal portal may be used and the whole vulva does
not need to be included. A mega-voltage photon field with appropriate
bolus to ensure surface dose, or an energy electron field may be
used.
If more extensive vulvar disease, the whole vulva will need to be
included, usually via AP/PA coaxial opposed portals using mega voltage
photons.
For inguinal and pelvic nodal treatment, the superior margin of the
radiation volume is at the level of the mid-sacroiliac joint (ie just
below the common iliac bifurcation). The inferior and lateral margins of
the radiation volume are determined clinically. This volume can be
encompassed by mega voltage photon AP/PA parallel ports utilizing a tissue
compensator to shape the treatment volume as defined by CT scan. Other
options include using biased fields, a large anterior field covering the
pelvis and inguinal nodes with a small posterior field to boost the pelvic
nodes and anterior electron fields to boost the inguino-femoral nodes,
keeping to within the femoral neck tolerance of 42-47 Gy.
Sites of bulky disease can be boosted with direct electron or photon
fields using appropriate bolus.
Interstitial implants or intracavitary brachytherapy eg. Intravaginal
cylinder for vaginal extension, may be used as a boost.
1. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Management of
Gynecologic Cancers. Volume1, No. 1, 1996
2. Heaps JM, Fu YS, Montz FJ et al. Surgico-pathological
variables predictive of local recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma of the
vulva. Gynaecol Oncol 1990; 38: 309.
3. Iversen T , Abeler V, Aalders J: Individualized
treatment for stage I squamous cell vulvar carcinoma. Obstets Gynecol
1984;63,155.
4. Hacker NF, Leuchter RS, Berek JS, et al. Radical
vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy through separate groin
incisions. Obstets Gynecol 1981;58,574.
5. Homesley HD, Bundy BN, Sedlis A, Adcock L: Radiation
therapy versus pelvic lymph node resection for carcinoma of the vulva with
positive groin nodes. Obstets Gynecol 1986;68,733.
6. Jones RW and Matthews JH. Early clitoral carcinoma
successfully treated by radiotherapy and bilateral inguinal
lymphadenectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1999;9,348.
7. Stehman FB, Bundy BN, Thomas G, et al: Groin dissection
versus groin irradiation in carcinoma of the vulva: A Gynecologic Oncology
Group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992;24,389-396.
Dr James L. Nicklin
M.B., B.S. (Qld),
F.R.A.C.O.G., C.G.O
Gynaecologic
Oncologist
Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer